Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (15475)	6/4/2001 7:58:44 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (4) of 82486

Fill in those of us who don't get cable. CH, you're a piece of work. First I have to read the New York Times for you. Now I have to watch TV for you... Here's what the Post has had to say. washingtonpost.com washingtonpost.com According to Fox, the news, published in a Kansas City paper, that a GSA study had found no vandalism was not accurate. There was only a letter from GSA to Barr saying that GSA had inspected the building, not the furnishings, and found nothing inappropriate. There has been no study by either GSA or GAO. Fox has been all a-twitter that the damage is worse than the list provided by the White House to the Post and that the Clinton staff shouldn't push their luck asking for an apology. They've also referenced remarks by Clinton that, if there were damage, he would make it right. Fox is interpreting that as Clinton having said that he would pay for the damage and is challenging him to do so. They're really harping on this over and over. Karen

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next