SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (106736)6/5/2001 6:46:49 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
>>But I think the matter was probably out of the power of the Federal Reserve to control, because I think - and this is a working hypothesis, subject to revision - that the main culprits were overproduction, tariffs, unproductive foreign loans, bank defaults, asset deflation, and a breakdown in the foreign exchange system. <<

I think all Tice and others are saying is: The above items were simply symptoms of a larger and earlier disconnect between banking policies and fundamental longer term economic constraints ...

What's wrong with the Austrian's idea that investment must be supported by savings and not simply primed by credit unrelated to the same?

Doesn't this make sense in a world of limited resources -- you can direct capital (economic resources such as labor, raw commodities, etc, -- not $$s) either to the satisfaction of current wants or further investment in productive capacity?

And that these balances must needs be set by a marketplace and the only way to do that properly is for money / credit creation be constrained somehow by savings -- foregone current consumption?

Certainly there is little of this relation captured in our current system, no?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext