SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 496.34-0.2%3:56 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles Tutt who wrote (58677)6/7/2001 8:37:59 AM
From: t2  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Then why did Microsoft seek further delay by not going straight to the Supreme Court?

Appeals Court allow for a much better and detailed review. The Supreme Court would want the input from the Appeals Court in addition to what Jackson had to say.

What you should be asking is-- why Jackson tried to create some national emergency on this case. He tried to pull a fast one on justice, imho.
Fear of being overturned repeatedly by the same high court....an attempt to decrease the scrutiny of his decisions.

One also wonders why the Supreme Court did not take the case. Since they concluded it was not that urgent, one has to question why Jackson did...I keep coming back to Jackson's fear of Appeals Court review.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext