Actually, I didn't say that, and I wouldn't say that.
Being so certain the cosmos was created by random matter is nothing but a religion in and of itself. There is no real proof either way, so I believe it's the height of narrow minded bigotry to call those you disagree with fools, over the eternal question which has haunted mankind for millenium.
Here's a question for you to ponder over. Which one of these makes more sense?
"In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God, he was with God in the beginning. And through him all things were made. Without him nothing was made that has been made, in him was life, and that life was the light of men."
Or....
"In the beginning were the particles, and the impersonal laws of physics. And the particles somehow become complex living stuff on their own power, assisted only by the laws. The stuff imagined God, but then discovered evolution." |
