SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 215.43+0.2%2:23 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (43764)6/11/2001 10:49:02 AM
From: dale_laroyRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
>Why would AMD produce a single Tbird, when the risks of Palomino bugs becomes insignificant - say in Q4 2002? Palomino is a significantly better core than Tbird, with a negligeable increase in die size. (the same on the Duron / Morgan side).<

To begin with, AMD has till now revealed no plans to produce Palomino at Fab25. Designing a variant of Palomino to be produced at Fab25 would require scarce engineering resources. They already are producing TBird at Fab25.

Additionally, There is reason to suspect that, with a few more tweaks of their Fab25 process, they can match the peak speed grade of desktop Tualatin with TBird alone, desktop Palomino would take AMD well beyond the peak speed grade of desktop Tualatin.

The lineup by mid-H2 2002 should be:

Morgan versus C3/C4 and possibly Celeron.

Appaloosa and TBird versus desktop Tualatin. TBird matching desktop Tualatin's L2 cache while Appaloosa exceeds its peak speed grade and consumes less power at the same level of performance (for most applications).

Desktop Barton between desktop Tualatin and desktop Northwood (possibly versus residual Willamette).

Desktop Clawhammer versus desktop Northwood.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext