(1) Do my posts expand the horizons of knowledge? If not, what steps can I take to improve my posts?
No. Learn something about reality. Learn how to reason.
(2) Are my posts well-written?
Varies. C-.
Are all the words spelled correctly? Have I used quotation marks and semicolons correctly? For instance, in
your previous post, you wrote: "... in contradiction to flappies disparaging comments towards this thread ..." You should have written it: "...
in contradiction to Flappy's disparaging comments toward this thread ..." If we can't trust you to get your possessives right, how can we trust
you on the bigger stuff?
Spelling and grammar wars are the sign of a vacant mind in search of an argument.
(3) Have I presented my arguments clearly?
Arguments> Have you presented any arguments here? I must have been gone that day.
You're kidding, right? You don't really think you have, right?
Have I documented my sources?
With trash.
Have I used legitimate news sources, or have I relied on
rumor, trash-bashing, baiting, innuendo, newsmax.com, Limbaugh's Web site, hearsay, half-truths and lame arguments?
Well, you consider them legitimate. I guess.
hearsay, half-truths and lame arguments? Sorry, we don't use those. The left has the patent on them.
This is where young
Michael Cummings falls short, and I don't want to see you travel the same path.
Michael, my boy, is just fine. The fact that you don't recognize that is another symptom of your illness. |
