Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Peter W. Panchyshyn who wrote (1103)	6/13/2001 10:09:34 PM
From: whitepine	Read Replies (3) of 11633

OK, post the dates, facts, cost of investment, and returns annualized over time. I have not invested in RT's since 1985, so I personally don't go back that far. Nevertheless, what has been your annualized rate of return since 1985? Second, how would these figures compare if you did not use the current PWI price, but instead used a price when NG was 1/2 its current value? I ask this, because if the price of NG (and subsequent returns) are calculated after the next downward movement, the rate of return would be far less. The discussion reminds me of those who touted Certicom at 100 as it moved to 120. It is now below 4 I believe. Twenty years from now? Who knows. My time horizon (and my life) is not that long. Perhaps you will live another 50 years. If you also own Japanese equities, you might need that time. I don't want to be caught in a two-decade decline. Further, I would be far less critical if the recent dilution of PWI was for the purchase of reasonable investment that added to earnings. As I understand it, the last dilution did nothing to advance earnings or increase reserves.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next