Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (16678)	6/14/2001 12:56:21 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) of 82486

The one complaint I would agree with is that the US left the dam-man in power when they had him beat. This was done for several purely political reasons, as a balance to Iran, and to extract themselves from the perception of having put a puppet regime in place. I think they under estimated him badly. So in that sense I would agree that the US has a high degree of responsibility. If we did drive to Baghdad Saddam could not have stopped us. However the result would probably have been either us leaving Iraq with even more violence and instability then it has had, or leaving a large US force there to support the government we set up. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next