International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Terry Christopher who wrote (12265)	6/15/1997 1:08:00 PM
From: Tom Cat	of 35569

Terry, you are correct, but the major difference here is that they knew what they got based on extensive drilling,I don't think IPM is at that stage yet....they should publish all 121 holes first with either leach or fire assay method and let the market decide whether they are worthy to command their current cap. Furthermore, post Bre-X, they should publish the name of the lab and whether or not they are keeping split core for further verification .......people should read the Bre-X thread (every single post) before investing in junior golds, IMO the only positive thing that BXM did is to teach us to suspect from the crooks, apparently people did not learn yet.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next