SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (17212)6/20/2001 6:34:21 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
Now, we can uphold those principles of equality when it comes to color
issues, etc. But the neither the comparison nor the ability exists when we say
that an embryo is a person and therefore has equal rights, etc. etc. etc.


Equal rights, of course, don't mean identical rights. A twelve year old child doesn't have the right to drive, no matter how much it would enhance his pursuit of happiness. A five year old child can't commit murder. A sixteen year old doesn't have the right to contract, to marry, etc.

The particular rights given to the embryo would be consistent with its nature and character. They would not necessarily be identical to the rights accorded to full adults.

I don't know what sorts of situations you think would arise with an embryo having rights that would destroy civilization when the rights accorded to one day old babies haven't destroyed civilization.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext