<< Why, after suggesting that HSCSD fills in GPRS's gaps, did Nokia reduce the speed for HSCSD down to 14 kbps by inserting error correction >>
It did NOT!
<< I think I'm correct in my thinking that if error correction is not used, as was originally envisioned for HSCSD, the data rate increases but its reliability decreases. >>
You are, unfortunately, wrong on all counts (essentially).
<< And that, according to you and Nokia, is unacceptable. If unacceptable, how can HSCSD be ethically marketed without error correction to corporate users [buy this! It's fast!] who need error-free data transmission [sell/buy, account numbers, EKG, etc.]? >>
Oi!
The translation may not be the greatest, but read what it says the consequence of mofifying error correction is, and do some more homework, or listen to l ... Please.
<< If my understanding that data transfer rates for error-corrected HSCSD are in the 14.4 vicinity, max, is correct, what business case can be made for corporate users to be charged more for a lousy 5 kbps of increased speed? I >>
Oi again. Can you multiply by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8?
Can you differentiate the 2 modes of operation.
How does IS-95B get to 64 kbps. can you multiply by 8.
In the interim, I have a post in progress that may (?) help to explain things.
You in the interim, ain't being to "rigorous". <g>
- Eric - |
