SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation
WDC 237.41-1.9%11:15 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (20475)6/22/2001 2:20:30 PM
From: Ausdauer  Read Replies (1) of 60323
 
John, I am not sure when we pass emulsion film as far as resolution is concerned...

...but we must be pretty close. From a practical standpoint, however, there still needs to be a convenient way to display these multi-megapixel images on photographic paper. As much as I love my Epson printer, my Canon EOS 35mm camera sets the bar pretty high. Inkjet just isn't there yet.

The Canon G1 has several nice features. Very solid construction with a crisp LCD screen, a bundled Lithium battery, 16 MB of SanDisk CF storage, very brief (almost imperceptible) shutter lag, relatively rapid shot-to-shot time thanks to an internal buffer, and very high image resolution. On the fine (large) resolution setting with mild JPEG compression the file sizes are about 1 MB each. I can fit 130 or so images on a 128 MB SanDisk CF. There is also a Quicktime movie mode that takes 30 second clips at 320x240 resolution. These eat up about 5 MB of storage space each. The only problem is that the zoom, the autofocus and autoexposure become fixed at one value once you start a movie clip. Also, the resolution leaves much to be desired. You have to view it in a relatively small window on your PC (about 2 1/2" x 4") for it to be sharp.

Aus
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext