Lakers,
Good post.
<< Now I suggest you go get a copy of IS-2000 standard >>
They are on my HD, and I'll confes I haven't opened them for awhile.
<< Check out the spec of physical layer. >>
Now before I do that, lets make sure we are on the same version, and the same page.
Are you, first of all, referring to "TIA/EIA/IS-2000.2-A, Physical Layer Standard for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Systems", dated March, 2000. 30.
If yes (or if not), please reference the standard version you are referring to, and then the page(s).
<< check out the number of sup channels available, then tell me what would be the Max throughput it can have. >>
You are the brains of the outfit. Perhaps you could run through the math for our edification. Would you mind?
<< it seems to me what IJ said in Cannes is looking more and more accurate now. >>
Cannes, or London, or both?
This is, of course, after he kind of changed the "commercial" suffix word from "availability" to "viability".
Perhaps, you might list the things he said that are looking "more and more" accurate now ... and btw, some of the things he said were accurate even then.
<< Nok FUD comparing with the Qcom FUD ... no doubt both sides are using the very common marketing tricks in promoting their standards >>
I'll comment further on this ... but later.
- Eric - |
