Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.83

0.0%

10:44 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (11961)	6/24/2001 12:41:33 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (2) of 196851

>>By all appearances, in accordance with the court's opinion, NextWave is the aggrieved party... << Isn't the federal government (i.e., the taxpayers) the aggrieved party? After all, when NextWave couldn't pay, the government/taxpayers suffered. Put another way, the federal government is the largest of the receivers, since, if the reauction of the spectrum initially sold to NextWave is nullified, then the federal government must reimburse each of the bidders and can then pursue its claim against NextWave. It seems to me that the FCC created this problem by failure to guard against the reselling of spectrum, making NextWave into nothing more than a real estate broker speculating in a burgeoning market. Who represents the taxpayers in this mess? The guy who formerly represented NextWave? Art

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next