Ah, yes, the lovefest for Jonathon Joseph continues.
Of course, last July, that wasn't the case. Back then, Engel was calling him Jonathon Jokeseph. Practically everyone on the thread was calling him on the carpet because he didn't have extensive evidence of an industry slowdown. He made an extrapolation based upon preliminary data. He was speaking haphazardly back then, of course. Now, he's a thoughtful analyst.
When Joe Osha took the reins from Kurlak, he immediately raised his rating on Intel. The thread praised him for his original thinking, even though he had none. Now, of course, with Osha negative on Intel, he's a buffoon.
As always, no one on this thread cares about the quality of Intel research. It is pretty easy to discern an analyst's opinion by reading this thread. If the thread thinks an analyst is good, he is positive on Intel. If the thread thinks that an analyst is bad, he is negative on Intel. |
