Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (72112)	6/26/2001 9:04:12 PM
From: leeza_ze_viphre	Read Replies (1) of 122088

Your word is not enough in a court of law. You cannot assert a privilege in reference to all of this correspondence and that could become important later. The average person might not understand that their correspondence is fair game... your word may not have any bearing as to whether the correspondence becomes available to others...whereas if they send it directly to the attorney it may be covered and may stay confidential... given the magnitude of this case, the ramifications, and possible problems...I would think you would want to be able to have as much as possible covered by privilege when it comes to discovery... but again, just my personal opinion

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next