Rande Is . . . HOME Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rande Is who wrote (52647)	6/27/2001 4:51:11 AM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (1) of 57584

Cool post, I've sat by and watched orders filled that are much lower and some much higher than mine, and once the order is complete, it is obvious the analyst were trying to take it high, and left the few low bids to snatch up the higher bids taking a loss, but knowing if the small player were to play, he would have to go with the flow...in this case up to pay for the "cheap ones" they had picked up on the way up, in order to fill a large order. I have have seen lower bids than mine snatched up, leaving mine sitting there completely ignored, only to close the day canceled.... It seems it could be done electronically with no middle man needed, and it would be much fairer filling of orders.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next