Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.35

-0.4%

Dec 4 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jeff Vayda who wrote (12146)	6/27/2001 12:42:20 PM
From: Andrew N. Cothran	Read Replies (1) of 196830

I am in total agreement, Jeff. How could the FCC deal prudently when it was under the leadership of a political hack who admittedly had a personal ax to grind. Not only was Kennard in Nextel's pocket (now on their payroll), but he acknowledged publically that he held Nextwave in contempt. Nextwave never expected fair treatment at Kennard's hands. But it knew that it had one hell of a case when it got to court. The court proved Nextwave right and Kennard wrong. The entities that bid in the reauction knew the score going in. They just don't like to have to play the game in extra innings, particularly since they lost their best pitcher.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next