SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ahhaha who wrote (2538)6/27/2001 9:25:06 PM
From: IlaineRead Replies (1) of 24758
 
That's a speech which would never have been necessary if Eisenhower hadn't held back to let the Russians take Berlin. Churchill thought he was nuts - capturing Berlin was the culmination of the Allied war effort in Germany. Patton was irate. He thought it was the worst blunder of the war. Of course, Stalin would have held on to whatever the Russians captured, anyway, but letting the Soviets have part of Berlin wasn't such a good idea.

Well, it did do one thing - it showed both the capitalist system and the communist system, side by side, sort of a controlled experiment.

I have a piece of the wall - can't think about it without getting tears in my eyes.

Last night, by coincidence, I was reading an account of the fall of Berlin, and Hitler's final days. He ordered the army and the police to blow up all the bridges and factories and everything else before the Allies captured it - and Speer drove around persuading people not to obey the orders. The army quit supporting Hitler and many refused to defend Berlin, which was defended by civilians, mostly women, using rocket launchers they carried in wheelbarrows. They were afraid of being raped by the Russians.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext