Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (114)	6/27/2001 10:00:51 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (2) of 3143

The problem with your answer is that you qualify your answer. I can see at least 3 different qualify statements in your answer to my question that make the answer to the question less clear. My question begged a one word answer, yes or no. You came up with a paragraph in response. I shall say this right now and let us be very clear: I have made absolutely no agreements whatsoever with any law firm representing plaintiffs in this case that would give me illegitimate and preferential treatment over others. I didn't ask anything about it being legitimate or not, or preferential or not. The question is about the quantity of dollars that you would receive in a settlement and whether or not it is greater than others in the class action. And I have seen posts that state that you did post under two different aliases at another site at one point ("Ollie" and "Skibum"). Is this true? If so, are you excluding yourself from the action now? More importantly, does your counsel know that you are posting the details of the complaint on message boards? I would think that would be something that counsel would strongly discourage.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next