SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Left Wing Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Poet who wrote (4881)6/28/2001 5:03:25 PM
From: Win SmithRead Replies (1) of 6089
 
Poet, there was an amusing story in the NYT magazine a week earlier that makes a good companion piece to the Fox News Network story.

Talk-to-Yourself Radio: With Phil Hendrie Nothing Is as It Seems nytimes.com

Talk radio seems an appropriate comparison for the normal tenor and content level of political discussion on SI, all apoplectic all the time and all that. But it is possible to have some fun with it too, it seems. Recycling my favorite bit:

Hendrie described his own politics as "socialist." He voted for Gore but never let up on the man during the election. During the recount last November he had a field day, because so many of the events in Florida were nearly Hendrian anyway -- though not as Hendrian as some people believed. In November, the conservative magazine The Weekly Standard published a scornful article about the whacked-out people of Florida. The writer, Matt Labash, questioned the "citizenry's mental state," noting that "cockeyed logic" dominated the "the AM call-in shows" there. He continued: "Legions of callers suggest the election was fixed by Bush's brother. . . . After all, says one, Jeb owed his brother for not ratting him out when he was caught in the top rack of their bunk bed with a black girl. If the election is allowed to stand, many promise, there will be consequences. 'My people will not accept [an Electoral College victory],' says one Hispanic caller. 'We will revolt and go to the mountains."'

Should we tell him? . . .

Just before Mike is brought on the air, Hendrie has Dannger
liken Matthew Perry to Bob Dylan and then ratchets up the comparison one more
click: "You don't know what it is to need to do drugs; ask Judy Garland. Look,
Matthew Perry is to our generation what the pope is to millions of Catholics around
the world."

Mike hits the ground running: "You're trying to kill him! This guy you obviously
respect is trying to get help!" Mike adds: "I'm a person who's tried stopping drugs.
You're saying I can use drugs if I want?"

"I didn't say you could," Dannger explains. "I said I could understand if Matthew
Perry does." Mike can barely find the words, and when he does, Dannger just turns
another rhetorical corner: "Jesus carried the weight of the world just as Matthew
carries the weight of a generation. They both- I would even understand if Jesus did
drugs." Mike desperately tries to ground the conversation: "Jesus has nothing to do
with drugs!" Dannger calmly explains that Mike really can't understand these things.
Why? "I don't have the filter on that you straight people have on," Dannger says.
"I'm a gay man and a gay journalist, and so I don't have any blinders on." But even
as Mike is trying to sort out the claim of gay cultural superiority and its relationship
to television, Dannger has other thoughts: "If you're carrying the weight of the world
on your shoulders, don't you think a guy's entitled to do a little crack?" Mike begins
to sound like Yosemite Sam.

With Mike in the eye of this one-man hurricane, the show climbs to a level of
hysterical incoherence. The Dannger character has slowly brought together various
culturally sensitive strands -- celebrity privilege, religious sacrilege, gay elitism, drug
hypocrisy -- and Hendrie has tied them together with Mike's sputtering hysteria to
create the perfect talk-radio moment.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext