To all!...I wanted to find out if anyone has received the below email. I was sent this over the weekend. I emailed Peggy to clarify it but got no response,.. For me this was not what I wanted to see on top of loosing the Tepaul contract. I am no longer going to be on the thread cuz I no longer will be following immd.
Irene
----------
> From: Carmel Research <carmelr@ibm.net>
> To: rjlynn@nebula.ispace.com
> Subject: Carmel Research, Inc. vs Immudyne, Inc.
> Date: Saturday, June 14, 1997 10:58 PM
>
> >From internet monitoring, it appears you follow Immudyne very closely.
> Carmel Research, Inc., as a major shareholder of Immudyne, is most
> concerned that during the recent rapid price increase of Immudyne, Inc.,
> Immudyne management has not made any announcement of the litigation
> filed by Carmel Research, Inc. against Immudyne, Inc. on May 30, 1997,
> styled Carmel Research, Inc., Plaintiff vs Immudyne, Inc., Case No.
> CV-N-97-00332-ECR in the United States District Court, District of
> Nevada. The lawsuit alleges infringement by Immudyne on patents
> exclusively licensed to Carmel Research on which Immudyne has no written
> license and on which no royalties have ever been paid.
>
> Nor has Immudyne announced that a temporary restraining order was issued
> in this lawsuit on June 6, 1997 which among other things, enjoined
> Immudyne from, "The selling or delivery of the Macroforce product to any
> store, retailer, wholesaler, or supplier pending the hearing on the
> issuance of a preliminary injunction herein." Immudyne replied on June
> 11, 1997 with a motion to dissolve the TRO and Carmel responded July 13,
> 1997 with a response as to why the TRO should not be dissolved. A
> hearing is set for June 19, 1997 at this time on the matter. The Judge
> has not ruled to date on either the Immudyne or Carmel motion and the
> TRO is still in place. Without comments on the merits of either party
> in the litigation, Carmel Research, Inc. is most concerned that Immudyne
> management has not announced the litigation in which Immudyne has
> already filed a response. Please confirm the above with Immudyne and
> the Nevada Court and ask Immudyne management why no announcement has
> been made. |
