SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 83.43-4.3%10:42 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (75160)6/29/2001 1:20:45 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Skeeter, there's the Nvidia nForce, which is allegedly also developed for the P4, but Intel won't license them for whatever reason. It's not entirely clear that the P4 wouldn't work ok with single channel DDR. But the P4 is set up to be a bandwidth pig via both a big cache line and a lot of prefetching. The 128 byte cache line would probably be a good match for single channel DDR, but the prefetching may well kill it. There was this McComas piece a little while back showing that in one SPEC program anyway, the P4 used 4x the memory bandwidth of the PIII to get a monumental 10% gain in performance, or something like that. And Intel was bragging about it!

Of course, the P4's piggishness with memory bandwidth may present other problems, as in it's not clear that it works very well in multiprocessors. See extremetech.com for a recent writeup.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext