"Why didn't anyone besides Intel decide to use RDRAM?" In other words, why didn't VIA, AMD, SiS, Serverworks, ALi, IBM, Nvidia, ATI, PMCS, Apple, etc., use RDRAM? Why did Intel decide to use DDR?
I really don't know why I even try, like talking privatization of social security with the left wing of the Democratic party.
But maybe a better question is why do Intel systems dominate corporate America, why does Dell only offer Intel, why has Compaq decided to scrap their Alpha chips and go with Intel, geez, I don't know. Maybe system quality.
Whatever. But I see this thread has bogged down to the point that RDRAM is now even slower than SDRAM100? Yes sir, no one delusional here at all.
I'm out of fantasy land, take it back, it is all yours.
Tinker |
