SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 94.82+2.7%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (75140)6/29/2001 2:21:23 PM
From: wily  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Carl,

I've stated repeatedly that I expect the costs and prices of RIMMs to drop to around 50% over the costs and prices of SDRAM and DDR DIMMs.

Sorry to make you repeat yourself -- I plead Mom&Pop noncomprehensionitis.

RDRAM has higher costs that add up to around a 50% premium, and this is too high to allow RDRAM to become mainstream.

Would you mind itemizing these, presumably, again <g>?

The memory makers are pretty sure that 4Q01 is going to be the peak quarter for RDRAM production and from there it will decline

Interesting assertion. Actually, the Samsung and Toshiba roadmaps show RDRAM production, as a percentage of total DRAM production, peaking in 4Q01 and then remaining at that level for the next 3 years (which is where the roadmap ends). What is your source for this information?

The R&D for RDRAM was expensive, and so is the cost to convert an SDRAM line over to RDRAM.

What costs are involved in converting?

Do you see, as Scumbria suggests, overall DRAM price weakness as accelerating RDRAM price competitiveness?

Thanks,
wily
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext