I am very anxious to find out whether the law firm has authorized and directed you to make the promises and representations that you have made on this thread and other threads on this and other sites.
- DrMensaWannabe
I understand that your use of the specific legal terms "authorized," "directed," "promises," and "representations" is unlikely to be coincidental. These are contractual and binding terms in law. There goes the final alarm. I don't honestly believe this is any coincidence. The problem with you people is that you continue to use the exact same tactics to deceive people and by now they are completely clapped-out and transparent. They are known.
You have been exceedingly negative and deconstructive since this thread was established. I would like to know why. What is your motive in doing so? If you are here to lead plaintiffs then why did you not begin a year ago? Why did you not contact a law firm? Or did you? Have you ever posted under multiple aliases at SI? I have answered your questions in good faith. Now, I would like an immediate answer to mine. Having others state that you are not working on the opposing side is quite different than your stating so here. Therefore, I would ask you the following questions. I have answered yours, now please answer mine:
1. Are you working on behalf of brokerage firms or chat sites, or a law firm representing brokers/sites, or anyone affiliated with such?
2. Are you currently employed by a brokerage firm or chat site or an affiliate of these?
3. Are you attempting to mislead SI Members about this case and about myself personally?
4. Have you ever met me?
5. Have you ever attempted to secure Counsel for this case at any time?
6. Why did you imply that I might become a defendant in this case? Do you have evidence of any wrongdoing on my part? (If not you commit libel.)
You stated as if you knew for certain this case would be a class action lawsuit. I repeat to you what I stated earlier: what class? Did I ever state that this would be a class action? This is why I have stated so often that there is far too much reckless presumption going on here. If there is no class action, then perhaps it would be wise for plaintiffs to come forward now. I will have contact info for those of you who wish to do so shortly.
Why do you insult my father?
As for your finding out what the law firm has stated to me, you won't as all of that is privileged.
For the record, would you please list all the promises and representations I have made here, what they are in your opinion. Thank-you. In that way this matter can be openly addressed. I have made personal statements here at SI under my own name. That is my position at SI as of today.
Tim's relationship with me, like mine with attorneys, is none of your business, but I will say this: in my opinion he is one of the few honorable posters at SI. He does not openly defame members or seek to tear down others and he has displayed great courage against some powerful interests here.
Now, if you are a friend of this case then why do you constantly attack he who is leading it? Do you wish this position for yourself? Is that why? Lisa's comments certainly indicated that to me. How much greed and hatred, selfish dealing and egotism is there here at SI? I have yet to state that here but these posts are striking me that way, on the I perceive to be slim chance that these attacks do not originate from brokers/sites. Instead of arguing over damage awards before a case has even been filed, as has been done here - imagine how a jury will judge this ridiculous behavior down the line, and maybe it was intended that way by some posters here, to cleverly attempt to hold day traders up to ridicule - or arguing about who is its leader, why not add to the discussion.
Finally I wish to say the following. You stated that a letter has been sent to the managing partner of this firm. I would be very clear with you now: it is your right to send unsolicited letters to Counsel if you wish; however, it is NOT your right to interfere in any aspect of attorney/client relationships. As it seems you wish to be well-versed in this case then I would state that you have no excuse not to know this. If it comes out that you are indeed working on behalf of the other side, then you have made a very serious error here. Still, you can clear this up right now with a clear, unequivocal statement that you are not involved with any brokers/sites whatsoever. I hope you do.
O.A. |
