SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (464)7/1/2001 6:25:30 PM
From: Dr.MensaWannabe  Read Replies (1) of 3143
 
"Come again? To which "buddies" are you referring, lol? Please clarify this insinuating-I-don't-know-what statement. That is laughable. "

Actually, no it isn't laughable. If someone had posted under two premium account aliases on SI or any other site, would you call them dishonest and not worthy of being a plaintiff? When I say two premium accounts I mean two accounts that have not been terminated and are considered to be active.

I do think I have answered the question about chat site and brokerage firms but I can't state with 100% accuracy that I did make the post.
That pretty much sums up exactly what I mean. Even Tim Luke has told you he is pretty sure that I have no affiliation with a chat site or brokerage firm.

As far as not answering your questions now, there is most definitely a point to that...but it doesn't mean the point that you are stating with your posts.

So if I understand this correctly, you are stating that Lisa is a dishonest plaintiff and you are representing the law firm when you say she will not be allowed to be a plaintiff. Correct?

So now, please go ask those same questions to EVERY SINGLE POSTER ON THIS THREAD...and let's see the responses. I am most curious.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext