SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (467)7/1/2001 6:58:49 PM
From: Dr.MensaWannabe  Read Replies (1) of 3143
 
You have NOT answered these eminently fair and reasonable questions specifically and directly yourself. In my eyes, that silence speaks volumes.

Now, please go ask these same questions to every single person who has posted on this thread, including yourself.
However, you should not limit it to just Silicon Investor because the same principle applies be it S.I. or another chat site.

We will talk again after you do so.

And you still haven't answered my question as to whether you believe that someone who has posted under two active aliases on SI or any other site would be considered dishonest and not worthy of being a plaintiff.

Btw, you have stated that you can assert that Lisa will never be allowed to be a plaintiff in a case with this law firm. How can you state that as fact if you aren't representing them ? I do think you have pretty much maintained, implied, and stated as fact that she is a dishonest plaintiff and not worthy of seeking remedy in this case.

Now, I have no more to say until the results are in from EVERYONE on this thread in reference to your litany of questions.

I continue to make an ass out of myself and it is time to stop until the results from your poll have been tabulated and calculated.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext