"Dave, if I may, let me summarize the logic of your post.
1. Cut and Paste.
2. Blah, blah, blah....Blah!!!
3. Buzz word, Buzzword, Buzzword
4. Ergo...I am right.
In response and in rebuttal to your argument, which contains not one wit of legal reasoning, let me just uncategorically state:
Yo Mama!!!!!
:)))
I must admit that I have not studied the opinion in great detail, there maybe no compelling need to really analyze right now. I believe the opinion authorizes winxp, and the .net initiative, which is my only short term concern."
That seems to sum up the problem with the public interpretation of the appeals decision, or, for that matter, the way people in general get their news, and unfortunately, form their opinions. They watch the tube, or read a newspaper article, listen to the media BS, and think they know what's going on. And, for some reason, never they never seem to get around to reading the source document. My only suggestion to those who haven't, would be do the intelligent thing, buck up, and take the time to read the source document in it's entirety, and form your own opinion. After you do that it's amazing how silly and obvious the media spinmasters appear. IMO. |
