SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wolf speed
WOLF 17.55-1.5%12:18 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: William who wrote (5446)7/2/2001 2:00:38 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (1) of 10714
 
Does any of this directly impact CREE?

Absolutely....if Rohm/Cree could prove that Nichia infringed on their patents. It doesnt sound like the patent which Rohm is alleging that Nichia violated is fundamental to the creation of a blue LED (power saving) but it could be essential to certain types of applications (mobile phone displays).

Just a guess...but I doubt that anything dramatic is going to occurr in the various legal cases that Cree/Nichia have going. It seems to me that these companies were working on these products during the same time frame....which leads me to believe that they both could have some IP. A cross-licensing deal seems to be the most likely outcome....havent looked at any of the patents so take it for FWIW.

Generally, I think that a mainentance of the status quo is a victory for Cree....three companies supply most of the blue LED's for the world. Much better than bringing in dozens of low-cost Asian suppliers....

Slacker
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext