Rarebird,
A very short rebuttal to your reply.
Upfront i would like to suggest that apples and oranges
are being mixed here, in that what you have submitted
is an example to highlight my postion that the official
Bush Administration's "strong dollar policy" is just a cover,
as in deception, to the actual "work in progress" that will
soon take effect and "get real [and] cut the fantasies"
such that the following article of which you referenced
will just be another item used to keep secret from both
the Congress, Senate and American public the actual
"work in progress" to deal with the type of situations
mentioned as being present in the world economies
by those commentators at the Le Metropole Cafe
that profess huge amounts of Doom & Gloom existing
and hidden, with that "not if, but when" house of cards fall.
Just to double click on my above point,
this article written by Lawrence Lindsey
is the administration’s dollar policy
implemented by secretary o'neill,
it is not that which i believe describes
the details of what is really being worked on.
Believe it or not,
as this is kind of an off the wall type observation,
but that article written here by Lindsey
is what the administration would expect from O'Neill
under conditions as i suggest, that O'Neill is on purpose
keep in the dark and only used to shield the "work in progress."
march/april 2001
© The International Economy
The Magazine of International Economic Policy
President Bush’s chief economics adviser,
Lawrence Lindsey [wrote] the following article
on the administration’s dollar policy...... |
