Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (137899)	7/5/2001 9:11:50 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 1584893

While I'm not so sure I liked the way the USSC reached its decision, it doesn't really seem like a states rights case to me, so this at least is not a "blaring inconsistency" in Bush's behavior. Tim, when the FL Sup. Ct. did not rule in Bush's favor, he asked the US Sup. Ct. to intercede. When the FL Sup. Ct. again did not rule in Bush's favor, the Sup. Ct. interceded again. The US Sup. Ct's involvement was instigated by Bush and his cronies. Most people took that to mean that Bush does not have a strong conviction in a state's ability to rule on its own matters.....or at least when the state is FL. Apparently, he only feels strongly about states' rights when he is a governor of one and not when he is running for president. ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next