SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.26+0.5%Dec 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (24852)6/17/1997 1:31:00 AM
From: Ali Chen   of 186894
 
Paul, I do not believe. In contrast to you, I just know.

And concerning your speculations about memory, everything you have said is WRONG. I already told you this, but you did not learn. In modern chipsets, most memory accesses happen in burst mode, when the cache controller is trying to maintain the cache coherency. It is called a "cacheline fill". With proper read/write buffering in the chipset, these fills can be combined into longer bursts. For EDO DRAM this leads to much better "effective access time", if you prefer. SDRAM has some specifics that limits it from 2.5-fold increase in performance (please notice, 2.5X, not 5X). Details, as I said before,
could be found on Micron Web page, for example.

Yes, 100 is 33% faster than 66.6667. But overal effect of scenarios you mention is very small. You must know that the power of computing is realized through the numerous repetitive loops, otherwise the time for coding would never be justified. Sorry if this is off topic. - Ali
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext