Marek,
Bill Murphy of Gata is more like a Hutch type,
than that longone Richard version.
As Bob has reminded us many times, one can expect spitballs
from both sides whenever a neutral position is taken.
Its not the neutral position itself that causes the flurry,
its the voiced opinion of these neutered type folks
that wish no engagemint or penetration of others,
but to just stand inside a crowd of people
and be hear, but not felt. [this, good Babble eXample.]
The following is just my interpretation,
or i'm sure, some if not most close to all
will say, my in-tripe-pretation.
Just like in outdoors survival techniques,
like those old49errors fell flat on her face
saying will be needed, and nope none needed,
as i proven by posting the first Y2K post here
on this thread 3 minutes after her pre-dick'less
4sure will happened, did not, its first find shelter
from the cold & hot & wind & rain, then obtain water,
then food, then weapons, then beer, then etc.
For any possible economic crash its the same,
first obtain wealth, as in Hutch is correct,
its the money stupid, as thats your shelter
from which you can then address all the other needs
that you need and wish to continue for survival.
Just to point out this point better, there is no need
to worry about contradictions that will arise when one
obtains shelter using measures that are anti to those
methods used to obtain the remaining survival elements.
If obtaining shelter requires the destruction of food sources,
then it must be done. Now anyone still here reading this post
may ask "What about moral or religious beliefs?" as in these
are core to me the person, its who i am amd wish to continue as,
to go against them may obtain for me that first survival shelter,
but it seems that the solution is worst than the problem.
ok
No problem, that choice is up to you. Many folks have choicen
that path, and of them many have lost and suffered because of it.
If warning and directions and even explainations to such are given
and people as Rarebird describe, reach that fork in the road
where the left path is to accept and agree with others descisions
rather than the right pathway that requires thinking and understanding
so that you can arrive at your own conclusion, then so be it.
To me the "so be it" is where i will walk over and step on anyone
who has taken that left path of the fork in the road and followed
others without knowing the road and destination and arrived at
a place that i need to cross to move out of my way. At this point
my actions to obtain wealth does not have an consideration for those
who have been led by other to stand in front of me, blocking my way,
as to me they have attached a ring around their nose and then
tied a rope to it and then thrown the loose end of that rope into
a crowd of people letting anyone with the ability to pull on it, do so.
"... this is how derivatives works."
"... knowing that people trust the certificate..."
"... individual tried the same trick he is going to jail."
"... ask Hutch for all possible tricks public is not even aware of."
To this i can ask in a general manner,
"Why should Hutch tell you how to make money."
if by doing so lessens his ability to do so now and in the future?
If its manipulation legal or not, then all one has to be aware of
is that yes one can buy a hot car, but if it becomes identified as such
upon state registration, then the car is taken away from you
and transfered to its legal owner, and the money you payed for it,
to the cook or corrupt or innocent person, well thats you problem
as in task to get you money back, not the real owner of the car.
Now if i know the car was hot, stolen, then how do i treat
an opportunity to purchase this car knowing that i wish to
obatin this new Porche 911 for $5,000 while knowing that
i wish not to spend the $55,000 legally?
What if i replace above work "wish" with "need",
and then qualify "need" further.
Its everyone's call, to justify themselves to one's self.
What is the situation is not enough details,
but what is the environment is needed,
as in what values are held by those affected by you actions.
If they are non-thinking types,
then you may or not attach certain qualities to them,
for example, this person is a being but not an individual.
to be or not to be
is the only decision
ak |
