SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 88.13+1.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (75401)7/7/2001 9:20:16 PM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Actually, RDRAM has far worse EMI problems. The reason is simple, they're at much higher speeds. That's why RDRAM traces have to be provided with ground traces between the signal traces,......

Strip or micro-strip transmission line is well known as an effective method of controlling EMI on a PCB. The long RSL lengths require ground traces between to minimize cross-talk, not EMI.

In other words, RlDRAM takes data at 3x the speed of DDR, but using traces that are 3.33x as wide. Now do you get it?

The RSL trace is only 18 mil's wide. Whether the signal frequencies are 133MHz or 400Mhz isn't as important as the edge transition rate, amplitude and characteristics of the trace. The use of a current source into a properly terminated low impedance strip or micro-strip line generates very low emission levels since they are primarily in the TEM mode.
JMO's and no p***ing contest. <G>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext