SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jack of All Trades who wrote (11276)7/10/2001 12:24:32 PM
From: TechTrader42  Read Replies (2) of 52237
 
I'd better conclude on this topic here, before I get slung out the door. But yes, it is clear that 783.3 minus 484.4 isn't equal to 19. I left out the 0. Sorry. It's 190. But I still use 19 in my e-wave calculations, based on the number system of Aryabhata (500 AD -- or 5 AD, I should say), which had no zero. I wanted something ancient, because the ancients had a grip on Nature's Law.

I think I've satisfactorily explained my own e-wave system. It works for me, and presumably for millions of others. I can't very well change it at this point. It's based on natural phenomena and mathematics. We may be in a Wave 19 now, depending. Others have identified it as a Wave 14. I don't see their reasoning. Good e-wave analysis takes accuracy and discipline -- and imagination.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News