Impeach George W. Bush Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jttmab who wrote (4629)	7/11/2001 1:22:00 PM
From: JeffA	Read Replies (7) of 93284

Sierratimes.com BTW you will NOT like this website. hehe The UN has been greeted in the US with a firestorm of protests. In my opinion, they are backpedaling in the sentence you placed in bold. I was on the IANASA website and I have read a lot of what is taking place at the conference these 11 days. We can argue dates and words like proposed vs enacted, but what concerns me is the fact that these words exist in relation to "enforcement" by the UN. If the are not legally binding, why would the UN be having this conference? They are laying groundwork. 10 years from now they will reference this document and say something to the effect "In the July 2001 Conference on Small arms and illicit trading........ blah blah blah." This is a path we do not need to travel. This is a guest for whom you do not open the door. I will post links as you requested......

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next