SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.730-0.7%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: carranza2 who wrote (13539)7/11/2001 4:21:48 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) of 34857
 
<This group of ego-inflated idiots is directly responsible for the state of 3G in Europe and for the ludicrous cost of spectrum>

I still disagree. The bids were a function of market expectations [how much people would pay for 3G services] and how much can be squeezed into that spectrum [which is a LOT thanks to QUALCOMM].

Q! is the party most directly responsible for the size of the 3G bids. If Q! had required 20% royalty, the bids would have been smaller [since the service providers would have had to pay a bigger chunk of the revenue to Q!]. By providing enabling technology and charging a very low royalty, Q! caused the very high bids [perhaps too high since demand is not yet known and the timing of the technology availability isn't known either].

Mq
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext