Dawson Science (DWSC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Dawson Science (DWSC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: charles moore who wrote (292)	6/17/1997 3:04:00 PM
From: Greg Jung	of 397

You'll have much better action in RACE. Another chat board here on SI dedicated to keeping the faith. Also, VIAS. +2 today, it must be good. Ignore the financial profile, they can't quantify the potential, anyway. Even when these stocks devalue by factors of five or 10, you would have the consolation of knowing there is a bankrupt or disfunctional business at the end, they tried but failed. ------------- By blinders I meant the complete inability to gather the facts from the Davis article. If you don't believe it thats another issue but you and Jim continued to post as if you hadn't read it. His point about the DTC completes the mystery concerning how anybody would repeat the "Prudential is buying" the shares. I suppose now though you three or four will continue to flood the thread with more sanguine remarks about DWSC, I just want it stated and repeated, whenever I post, that the absurdities of the stock are evident. That it has a price that goes up ($3 from the FutureSuperStock promotion, etc.) and goes down I won't dispute. If you don't know what "tulip bulbs" refers to that fits perfectly. Greg

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next