>>What if he had failed the private test. Would you be as quick to discount the results?<<
That's a very excellent and fair question... probably not, but it would strengthen my hunch that he's guilty, and I would probably have said he can't even pass a make believe polygraph in non-hostile surroundings... again, I would have to agree with Carolyn, we would never know he took a polygraph if he had failed a private test... of course, he may have taken 25 private polygraph practice tests during that same session until he finally got so use to taking the test that he was able to lie successfully... in other words, how many mulligans did he take before he took the 'real' test... no one will ever know the real circumstances surrounding this private test... this is why I discount that test, it's a mockery... certainly, a police polygraph test is far more valid since it's under a more controlled setting, although I agree with you in general that polygraphs are useless and do not hold up in court... still, his obvious avoidance of a police polygraph only add further to his overall guilty demeanor.....
GZ |
