"So is it fair to infer from these comments (and in light of your non-response to bland's earlier questions) that "righteousness" in fact means nothing to you?
As an ultimate political goal, specifically."
What questions didn't I answer? I will answer any that I may have overlooked.
To your above question, "righteousness" means nothing to the democratic party. The party, however, must act as if "righteousness" means something in its statements to the public. The public wants to hear good things: fairness for all, and righteousness for mankind as a goal. It's not realistic. But it puts the democrats in power, which is what is desired.
Democrats in power creates power, alliances, money, friends-of-influence.
It is better to have power than to seek power.
As for me personally, I do have a moral. |
