SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 92.99+2.9%Nov 7 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rarebird who wrote (73491)7/16/2001 12:27:01 AM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (1) of 116753
 
You have stated many times your opinion that Gata will fail.

For myself i continue to post the Gata line and push their cause
and encourage others to join in.

Its called manipulation or not being truthful or simply a lie
when i only present pro-Gata news that has anti-Gata information
attached that i have removed or deleted or ignored.

So be it, its War and that saying "The first... "

So i will continue, as my next post displays,
but in fairness only because you have really touched
upon it in you post in a very pointed exact manner
i will acknowledge that there is a very good possibility
this time next year Gata Bill Murphy will be sitting
in a chair with his head hung between his knees
crying in his beer wondering how Gata's efforts were
so totally stopped and derailed and pushed aside
and replaced with stuff of the same rot by the people
who created the rot and never got punished and allowed
the masses of tax paying citizens to not only take the pain,
but got their ok to allow them to receive the punishment
that should have gone to the usa government people that
created a dollar that crashed & burned.

Sadly all signs point to a Gata losing the War, big time.

Hope i'm wrong, but atleast it will not affect me,
and all others on this thread have advanced warning
to prepare for either a Gata win or lost, using "hedging."

[From Rarebird] ( i added NewLine breaks to help me read it)

[start.]

... Of course not.

But isn't that the point?

There are no assurances either way.

There is no assurance
that investors will flock into gold stocks
if there is no economic recovery in 2002.

What assurance do you have
that the U.S. would not sell some of its gold reserves
like the BOE
if the economic situation here turned into another great depression?

What assurance do you have
that Congress would not vote
to have 90% of U.S. Gold Reserves sold
if a money default or major derivative crisis came about here?

What assurance do you have
that the majority of U.S. citizens
would not vote for the sale of U.S. Gold Reserves
if it was placed on the ballot here
and if the President, Congress
and the whole media argued on behalf of it?

[end.]

Note: Its a hurting funny laugh sounding like a scream.
From your above line, with my adding.
"... and the whole media[CNBC etc.] argued on behalf of it?

ak
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News