VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dustcatcher who wrote (39044)	7/16/2001 12:16:00 PM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (1) of 65232

wow, that is the costliest water I have heard of makes me wonder how long before California develops desalinization plants along the coastline in suburban Boston, they pay for connection to the Quabbin Reservoir that was filled in early 1900's with four planned flooded towns located in center of state, near UMass in Amherst it covers something like 200 sq miles and feeds Boston the pipes are something to behold, about 5-6 feet in diameter actually it is stunning with eagles sweeping regularly and beavers working busily recently, this Quabbin connection has seen costs lumped together with the Great Boston Harbor Cleanup effort I am unsure of exact details when I lived in a suburban town called Natick, I paid $120-140 per quarter for water and sewer that now is looking cheap but nowhere as cheap as the well I had farther out in suburbs that cost nothing except electricity just filter out the copper sulfate, and presto CLEAN WATER I had to replace a wellhead pump once for $90, no biggee bring on the DESAL plants to California much cheaper than building aquaducts, seeing 75% evaporate en route go Red Sox, come back Pedro / JW

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next