CONDIT Message Board - Msg: 16084151

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CONDIT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Carolyn who wrote (499)	7/16/2001 7:46:13 PM
From: 249443	Read Replies (4) of 1669

Carolyn: you may very well be correct. I am basing my feelings on the facts. If a crime has been committed, or if there is proof of a crime being committed -- then charge him with a crime. His legal counsel is required to give guidance on how to handle the situation. Somehow the public has convicted Mr. Condit -- and yet he has done nothing wrong. All we are hearing is what the media report and what the police leaks. If this was a slamdunk case (phone records, forensics, witnesses, unexplainable time line), then Mr. Condit would be in jail. The ex-FBI agent who gave the lie detector test trains current FBI agents on the process. He is one of the very best. For an innocent man to even take a lie detector test shows a compassion and desire for the truth to be released to the public. Mr. Condit needs to protect himself at this point.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next