Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (18402)	7/16/2001 9:48:07 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (2) of 82486

If these terms don't apply here they don't apply anywhere. Not true. These terms have relevance within accepted boundaries. If we accept that the earth and the moon exist, we can demonstrate the effects of gravitational force upon their orbits. We can "prove" that tides are governed by the gravitational force of the moon, and within the borders of the reality we have agreed to accept, we may consider our observation "true". But when the Buddhist comes along and says "prove to me that all of this is not maya, illusion", "proof" ceases to mean anything. At the outer limits of philosophy, these terms become meaningless. That doesn't mean they have no relevance to our practical lives. People who call themselves "humanists" while denying the basis of the human condition are bots. What is a "bot"? People who realize that we do not and cannot know the "basis of the human condition" are simply being honest with themselves. People who claim to know the basis of the human condition, or the origins of the universe, or the nature of absolute "right" and "wrong" are hiding beneath a blanket of self-deception. Why do some people find it so disturbing to admit that there are things we do not and cannot know?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next