SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.18-0.5%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (47950)7/17/2001 9:40:11 AM
From: jcholewaRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
OT:

> re: densely packed sheet of free top quarks
> You have me there. What does that mean?

Oh, heh. :)

That's just my wanna-be physics major mind at play.

A quark is one of the most elemental of particles which make up matter. See, atoms are made of electrons, protons, and neutrons, and the protons and neutrons there are each made up of three quarks and a bunch of associated particles that I won't get into. Anyway, the funky thing about quarks is that they can never exist on their own. A quark can only exist as a constituent of another particle (such as a proton or neutron). It can, they say, never actually exist in a free state.

Regarding the ignore feature ... from a logical perspective, you are absolutely correct. I use this feature on three people on this thread, and it is fairly effective in increasing the signal to noise ratio. However, from an emotional perspective, this whole scenario presents a hard parallel to things which happened to me in my childhood. When I was a kid, I was verbally abused by larger and more aggressive children. This caused me much stress and trauma, and using the ignore feature then was not really something that was effective. So, now, when I see people harassing others in a similar fashion, I find it very difficult to detach myself emotionally.

Sorry for going off on you. Actually, what really set me off, you see, was that your initial message complaining about those who were against dissenting opinions was itself sent to someone who has a dissenting opinion on this thread. Andy Wonisch has been talking down the stock for months, saying (I believe) that AMD's management has some problems. But you seemed to treat him as if he were a category 1 poster. I just kinda got bizarrely irked by that for some reason. :)

-JC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext