Relevancy
or
Replacement
This thread is a discussion about replacing God, period. In fact if you read the header, any God is fair game, Allah, God, Brahmin, Mephistopheles (in or out of running shoes). If you want to debate the merits of your particular belief, they are threads here for that. Chris Land, Jane Hafker, Santiago, Greg McRitchie and others are available for diatribes and large platters of self served tripe. Listen to this...
<<"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else."
So, the God who made the world does not invest.">>
How can any reasonable person deal with this statement, there is no appeal to reason, no logic and no support for the conclusion. It is exactly like a proclamation by the Taliban, the only difference being that their proclamations of truth are much firmer and the penalty for disbelief in what they tell you is clear.
Perhaps we could trade Gods for awhile. The people who have no clue can trade with the people who know it all. That way we would have a working God at all times. We could avoid awaiting the arrival of a replacement God. I think we should get two Gods, one replacement and one spare. |
