Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 36.82

+1.5%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Road Walker who wrote (139613)	7/18/2001 7:01:56 PM
From: andreas_wonisch	Read Replies (1) of 186894

John, Re: I'm too disgusted (and probably too dumb) to figure the EPS without "other". Well, if you eliminate "other" altogether these losses will disappear and won't hurt the bottom line. So from your data: IAG profits on 81% of the business - $1.466 billion "Other" losses on 19% of the business - ($1.249 billion) Overall profits would have been over $1.25 billion higher. With 6,889 million shares outstanding that's $0.18. That means overall ESP would have more than doubled without "other" (and operating profit would have been almost seven times as high). Of course this calculation only works, if there aren't any additional hidden costs in "other". Oh, and another point: Isn't flash covered in "other"? With Intel having approx. twice the flash share compared to AMD and AMD getting $316 million in Q2 it's reasonable to assume $500-600 million for Intel in Q2. Flash operated probably at break-even in Q2 (my guess). That means there's approx. $700 million left for "other" (total revenue was $1,207 million) which makes the losses even worse. Andreas

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next