SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (6074)7/20/2001 2:49:48 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (3) of 74559
 
CB,
I'm so confused.
Nevertheless, the question is, when the market crashed, was wealth destroyed?
Well call me Homer but I don't get it.

In fact, the easiest way for me to think about it is to think of one share of stock, or one block of stock. Mr. A buys stock XYZ at the IPO for $5. Later he sells it to Ms. B for $100. The stock then goes to $200, but Ms. B, unfortunately, holds on while the stock goes back to $5 and then sells it to Mr. C for $5.
Ms. B lost money on the deal, but do we say her $200 paper value was destroyed? Objectively speaking, her money didn't go to money heaven, she paid $100 to Mr. A and the $200 never existed


The 5$ and 100$ already existed as 'wealth' represented by the asset 'money'.
Wasn't the 100$ of the 200$ 'wealth' that was 'created' by an asset, the share, appreciating in value, which in turn could be used as collateral ie to by a new Platinum watch :o) or a 9$US 'Rolex' in the Beijing market LOL, EVEN if such a loan was never made as in Jays example.

Ms B's Balance Sheet (pro forma ha-ha) now shows an asset of 200$ and the change in position would be reflected by a Profit and Loss statement showing an investment gain of 100$ ????? Questions Questions.

Making Money 'Out of Nothing At All' --- I hope Air Supply forgives the poetic license.

The 5$ and 100$ were simply exchanged for another asset. 100$ of the 200$ share value is an exchange for the share asset which hence appreciated to 200$ market value increasing Ms B's wealth by 100$ (so he didn't need savings :o). The company goes bankrupt, is de-listed, and now the 200$ share is worthless. Now no one wants Ms B's share including Ms B. The day the company went bankrupt Ms B's portfolio decreased by 200$ and hence 100$ of wealth vanished .... or not ?

'Does illiquid wealth make you feel and act like you're rich with liquid wealth?'
My house will be paid in a few years. This causes the bank to offer me large lines of credit on a regular basis. God knows what could happen if I weaken one day and take too much :o)

Send me someone smart with small words, I'm so confused.

regards
Kastel
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext