Karl, I see the stock has some activity, relative of course
but still enough action taking place to coincide with the
latest spin doctoring on the Bull. Here’s a GPGI chart
showing it’s above the average bottom for the moment and
headed up..? quicken.excite.com
There are at least 2 characters that say GPGI is on the
verge of yet another “oh boy, you just wait and see, this
is big time now”. Then there are those that wait for a
check. And Scott who wants shareholders to give Jensen one
more chance since he knows the guy has sweated and cried
over the “process”.
Perhaps logically, the approach is to get Jensen first to
wrap old business and bring to closure what he is
responsible for making a farce of. And that would be his
complete lake of coherence between a set of PR campaigns to
the next set of PR campaigns.
A look at the GPGI 5 year chart against the Press Releases
and any rocket scientist’s brother can see volume increase.
All volume; Stock trading, SI posts, SI posts that
promise “it’s gonna be big”, “Jensen PR rhetoric about the
newer process”, temporary stock price and questions.
Everything increases in volume only to dissipate to even
lower levels after the wave has washed back into the sea.
Why. Perhaps basic business acumen is the problem.
Everybody I thinks wants to give Jensen all the chances he
needs as long as it is accompanied by a leader ready to
lead with integrity and respect. This can happen with the
same guy, our man Jensen, if he would only wrap up old
business. Jensen should bring to closure the last 6 years
of bad public relations. People interpret his moves and
motives because the PR campaigns lack coherency from one to
the next. Granted, each PR had always sounded better than
the one before but there were never any follow-ups to the
previous set of PR campaigns.
If one would read from one PR to the next then ok, there is
no problem. BUT when one spreads this out over 6 years the
situation looks like what? Speculation, that’s for sure.
Why? No follow-up from the leader. People now after six
years look at what might be good news, “oh boy”, with
uncertainty and doubt. Why? Jensen.
This might never go away until Jensen addresses the past
and brings the worst part of GPGI history to closure.
To tell the truth about these 6 years will make the company
move forward, quickly and unfettered. Did Jensen lie or
just make mistakes and why must we ask for a simple
communication protocol from the leader of our public
company?
Rhetorical questions. Thor |
